Skip to main content

Expiration Dating and Stability Testing of Solid Oral Dosage Form Drugs Containing Iron


 Expiration Dating and Stability

Testing of Solid Oral Dosage Form
Drugs Containing Iron



To meet the requirements of the iron regulations, manufacturers and packagers must determine an appropriate expiration date for the drug products in unit-dose packages. Accelerated stability testing may be impractical because drug products containing iron, especially multivitamin products, often do not perform well under the artificially stressful conditions of accelerated studies. As a result, real-time stability testing may be the only method to determine an appropriate expiration date. However, the final iron regulations were published only six months before they were to take effect; therefore, there may be insufficient time for some manufacturers of solid oral drug products containing 30 mg or more of iron per dosage unit to perform real-time stability testing on their products. To minimize the burden faced by those manufacturers who have made good faith efforts to comply with the stability testing requirements but were unable to do so, the FDA advises that, for a limited period of time, it does not intend to object if a manufacturer or packager fails to comply with §§ 211.137 and 211.166 under the following circumstances:


A. The firm sets an expiration date for tablets and capsule drug products packaged in
unit-dose packaging based on the following: (1) the expiration period does not exceed 75
percent of the expiration dating period of the smallest version (usually the least stable) of
the previously accepted product package and (2) the expiration period for the unit-dose
container does not exceed 18 months.

B. The firm maintains appropriate stability data that support the expiration dating
period used on the smallest version of the previously accepted product package.

C. The solid oral dosage form product put into unit-dose packaging is manufactured
and formulated in the same manner as the product put into the previously accepted
packaging.

D. The unit-dose packaging complies with either the Class A or Class B standard
described in USP 23, under "Single Unit Containers and Unit-Dose Containers for
Capsules and Tablets."
E. The firm monitors the long-term stability of each marketed lot of the unit-dose
products throughout the expiration dating period for all appropriate specifications,
including the strength of active ingredients, by testing each lot at least once every three
months. The firm performs the initial (time-zero) testing on a sample that has been
packaged in unit-dose packaging for the purpose of evaluating the effect of heat sealing on
the product. Once data to support the expiration dating period of up to 18 months have
been generated using appropriate stability testing on at least three lots, the firm may
discontinue testing every marketed lot in unit-dose packaging. Expiration dating periods
of longer than 18 months on unit-dose packaging may be used once appropriate stability
data have been obtained that fully support the expiration dating period prior to marketing
the lots.

F. If any of the testing, examinations, or investigations performed by the firm reveal
that a product may not meet appropriate specifications prior to the expiration date
assigned to the product, the firm will reevaluate the expiration dating period for the
product. If, based on the reevaluation, the firm determines that a shortened expiration
dating period is appropriate, it will use the shortened period for subsequent marketed lots
of the same product.

G. The firm conducts a prompt recall of any lot that falls outside of appropriate
specifications.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DATA INTEGRITY (ALCOA ++)

 INTRODUCTION   The purpose of this guidance is to clarify the role of data integrity in current good manufacturing  practice (CGMP) for drugs, as required in 21 CFR parts 210, 211, and 212. Part 210 covers  Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding of  Drugs; General; part 211 covers Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished  Pharmaceuticals; and part 212 covers Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Positron  Emission Tomography Drugs. This guidance provides the Agency’s current thinking on the creation and handling of data in accordance with CGMP requirements. FDA expects that data be reliable and accurate (see the “Background” section). CGMP  regulations and guidance allow for flexible and risk-based strategies to prevent and detect data  integrity issues. Firms should implement meaningful and effective strategies to manage their data  integrity risks based upon their process understanding and knowledge management of tec

PERMITTED DAILY EXPOSURE (PDE)

PERMITTED DAILY EXPOSURE (PDE) or ACCEPTANCE DAILY EXPOSURE Introduction During the manufacture of medicinal products accidental cross contamination can result from the uncontrolled release of dust, gases, vapours, aerosols, genetic material or organisms from active substances, other starting materials, and other products being processed concurrently, as well as from residues on equipment, and from operators ’ clothing. Due to the perceived risk, certain classes of medicinal product have previously been required to be manufactured in dedicated or segregated self contained facilities including, “certain antibiotics, certain hormones, certain cytotoxics and certain highly active drugs”. Until now no official guidance is available in order to assist manufacturers to differentiate between individual products within these specified classes. METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING EXPOSURE LIMITS The Gaylor-Kodell method of risk assessment (Gaylor, D. W. and Kodell, R. L.: Linea

21 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 211 Subpart K-Returned and Salvaged Drug Products

21 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 211 Subpart K-Returned and Salvaged Drug Products § 211.204 Returned drug products. Returned drug products shall be identified as such and held. If the conditions under which returned drug products have been held, stored, or shipped before or during their return, or if the condition of the drug product, its container, carton, or labeling, as a result of storage or shipping, casts doubt on the safety, identity, strength, quality or purity of the drug product, the returned drug product shall be destroyed unless examination, testing, or other investigations prove the drug product meets appropriate standards of safety, identity, strength, quality, or purity. A drug product may be reprocessed provided the subsequent drug product meets appropriate standards, specifications, and characteristics. Records of returned drug products shall be maintained and shall include the name and label potency of the drug product dosage form, lot number (or co